Had a discussion this morning on FB. "Non-partisan" fact checkers? Are there any? Here is a quick example of why they can't be trusted. Do your own research. Preferably not Google who is censoring dramatically. Links in the comments.
Search
Had a discussion this morning on FB. "Non-partisan" fact checkers? Are there any? Here is a quick example of why they can't be trusted. Do your own research. Preferably not Google who is censoring dramatically. Links in the comments.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2020/05/25/do-we-even-need-a-shot-now-covid-is-vanishing-so-quickly-in-the-uk-that-their-va-n2569409 https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-disappearing-so-fast-oxford-vaccine-has-only-50-chance-of-working-11993739 https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-researchers-warn-of-only-50-percent-success-for-covid-vaccine-trial https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/scientists-warn-of-going-too-fast-to-develop-coronavirus-vaccine-/5324983.html https://bgr.com/2020/05/25/coronavirus-vaccine-oxford-trials-delayed-not-enough-covid-19-cases/
I wonder if anyone else is really tired of this? They'll try to beat him to the ground with whatever is convenient....truth, virtue, faith, demeanor, language, etc. BUT, when the other side commits an actual infraction involving any of the preceding, "ah, nothing to see here."
That's not working for me.... If anything, it builds up "passes" for the president for any actual offenses. Kind of like what he said about 5th avenue...
This was sparked today by a post where she sited this fact checker as truth. So I began to dig and found they are liberal leaning and they site many platitudes but didnt actually provide facts to debunk a claim. The article was stating falsity on both sides spoken at the conventions. Again, they don't actually provide facts - more speculation than anything.